Latin Rulers of Constantinople 1204-1261AD Byzantine Coin Christ i30713

$175.00 $157.50

Availability: 1 in stock

SKU: i30713 Category:

Item: i30713

 

Authentic Ancient

Coin of:

Byzantine – Latin Rulers of Constantinople 1204-1261 A.D. –

Billon Trachea 24mm (1.85 grams) Constantinople mint: 1204-1261 A.D.

Reference: Sear 2025; DO IV.

Bust of Christ , holding scroll.
Emperor standing, holding labarum-head scepter.

You are bidding on the exact item pictured,

provided with a Certificate of Authenticity and Lifetime Guarantee of

Authenticity.

 

 

Labarum of Constantine I, displaying the “Chi-Rho” symbol above.

The labarum  was a
vexillum
(military standard) that displayed
the “Chi-Rho
symbol

, formed from the first two
Greek letters
of the word “Christ” 

Chi
and
Rho
. It was first used by the
Roman emperor

Constantine I
. Since the vexillum consisted of
a flag suspended from the crossbar of a cross, it was ideally suited to
symbolize the
crucifixion
of
Christ
.

Later usage has sometimes regarded the terms “labarum” and “Chi-Rho” as
synonyms. Ancient sources, however, draw an unambiguous distinction between the
two.

Etymology

Beyond its derivation from Latin labarum, the etymology of the word is
unclear. Some derive it from Latin /labāre/ ‘to totter, to waver’ (in the sense
of the “waving” of a flag in the breeze) or laureum [vexillum] (“laurel
standard”). According to the
Real Academia Española
, the related
lábaro
is also derived from Latin labărum
but offers no further derivation from within Latin, as does the Oxford English
Dictionary.[5]
An origin as a loan into Latin from a Celtic language or
Basque
has also been postulated. There is a
traditional Basque symbol called the
lauburu
; though the name is only attested from
the 19th century onwards the motif occurs in engravings dating as early as the
2nd century AD.

Vision of Constantine


A coin of Constantine (c.337) showing a depiction of his labarum
spearing a serpent.

On the evening of October 27, 312, with his army preparing for the
Battle of the Milvian Bridge
, the emperor
Constantine I
claimed to have had a vision
which led him to believe he was fighting under the protection of the
Christian God
.

Lactantius
states that, in the night before the
battle, Constantine was commanded in a dream to “delineate the heavenly sign on
the shields of his soldiers”. He obeyed and marked the shields with a sign
“denoting Christ”. Lactantius describes that sign as a “staurogram”, or a
Latin cross
with its upper end rounded in a
P-like fashion, rather than the better known
Chi-Rho
sign described by
Eusebius of Caesarea
. Thus, it had both the
form of a cross and the monogram of Christ’s name from the formed letters “X”
and “P”, the first letters of Christ’s name in Greek.

From Eusebius, two accounts of a battle survive. The first, shorter one in
the
Ecclesiastical History
leaves no doubt that
God helped Constantine but doesn’t mention any vision. In his later Life of
Constantine
, Eusebius gives a detailed account of a vision and stresses that
he had heard the story from the emperor himself. According to this version,
Constantine with his army was marching somewhere (Eusebius doesn’t specify the
actual location of the event, but it clearly isn’t in the camp at Rome) when he
looked up to the sun and saw a cross of light above it, and with it the Greek
words
Ἐν Τούτῳ Νίκα
. The traditionally employed
Latin translation of the Greek is
in hoc signo vinces
— literally “In this
sign, you will conquer.” However, a direct translation from the original Greek
text of Eusebius into English gives the phrase “By this, conquer!”

At first he was unsure of the meaning of the apparition, but the following
night he had a dream in which Christ explained to him that he should use the
sign against his enemies. Eusebius then continues to describe the labarum, the
military standard used by Constantine in his later wars against
Licinius
, showing the Chi-Rho sign.

Those two accounts can hardly be reconciled with each other, though they have
been merged in popular notion into Constantine seeing the Chi-Rho sign on the
evening before the battle. Both authors agree that the sign was not readily
understandable as denoting Christ, which corresponds with the fact that there is
no certain evidence of the use of the letters chi and rho as a Christian sign
before Constantine. Its first appearance is on a Constantinian silver coin from
c. 317, which proves that Constantine did use the sign at that time, though not
very prominently. He made extensive use of the Chi-Rho and the labarum only
later in the conflict with Licinius.

The vision has been interpreted in a solar context (e.g. as a
solar halo
phenomenon), which would have been
reshaped to fit with the Christian beliefs of the later Constantine.

An alternate explanation of the intersecting celestial symbol has been
advanced by George Latura, which claims that Plato’s visible god in Timaeus
is in fact the intersection of the Milky Way and the Zodiacal Light, a rare
apparition important to pagan beliefs that Christian bishops reinvented as a
Christian symbol.


Eusebius’ description of the labarum

“A Description of the Standard of the Cross, which the Romans now call the
Labarum.” “Now it was made in the following manner. A long spear, overlaid with
gold, formed the figure of the cross by means of a transverse bar laid over it.
On the top of the whole was fixed a wreath of gold and precious stones; and
within this, the symbol of the Saviour’s name, two letters indicating the name
of Christ by means of its initial characters, the letter P being intersected by
X in its centre: and these letters the emperor was in the habit of wearing on
his helmet at a later period. From the cross-bar of the spear was suspended a
cloth, a royal piece, covered with a profuse embroidery of most brilliant
precious stones; and which, being also richly interlaced with gold, presented an
indescribable degree of beauty to the beholder. This banner was of a square
form, and the upright staff, whose lower section was of great length, of the
pious emperor and his children on its upper part, beneath the trophy of the
cross, and immediately above the embroidered banner.”

“The emperor constantly made use of this sign of salvation as a safeguard
against every adverse and hostile power, and commanded that others similar to it
should be carried at the head of all his armies.”


Iconographic career under Constantine


Coin of
Vetranio
, a soldier is holding two
labara. Interestingly they differ from the labarum of Constantine in
having the Chi-Rho depicted on the cloth rather than above it, and
in having their staves decorated with
phalerae
as were earlier Roman
military unit standards.


The emperor
Honorius
holding a variant of the
labarum – the Latin phrase on the cloth means “In the name of Christ
[rendered by the Greek letters XPI] be ever victorious.”

Among a number of standards depicted on the
Arch of Constantine
, which was erected, largely
with fragments from older monuments, just three years after the battle, the
labarum does not appear. A grand opportunity for just the kind of political
propaganda that the Arch otherwise was expressly built to present was missed.
That is if Eusebius’ oath-confirmed account of Constantine’s sudden,
vision-induced, conversion can be trusted. Many historians have argued that in
the early years after the battle the emperor had not yet decided to give clear
public support to Christianity, whether from a lack of personal faith or because
of fear of religious friction. The arch’s inscription does say that the Emperor
had saved the
res publica
INSTINCTV DIVINITATIS
MENTIS MAGNITVDINE
(“by greatness of mind and by instinct [or impulse]
of divinity”). As with his predecessors, sun symbolism – interpreted as
representing
Sol Invictus
(the Unconquered Sun) or
Helios
,
Apollo
or
Mithras
– is inscribed on his coinage, but in
325 and thereafter the coinage ceases to be explicitly pagan, and Sol Invictus
disappears. In his
Historia Ecclesiae
Eusebius further reports
that, after his victorious entry into Rome, Constantine had a statue of himself
erected, “holding the sign of the Savior [the cross] in his right hand.” There
are no other reports to confirm such a monument.

Whether Constantine was the first
Christian
emperor supporting a peaceful
transition to Christianity during his rule, or an undecided pagan believer until
middle age, strongly influenced in his political-religious decisions by his
Christian mother
St. Helena
, is still in dispute among
historians.

As for the labarum itself, there is little evidence for its use before 317.In
the course of Constantine’s second war against Licinius in 324, the latter
developed a superstitious dread of Constantine’s standard. During the attack of
Constantine’s troops at the
Battle of Adrianople
the guard of the labarum
standard were directed to move it to any part of the field where his soldiers
seemed to be faltering. The appearance of this talismanic object appeared to
embolden Constantine’s troops and dismay those of Licinius.At the final battle
of the war, the
Battle of Chrysopolis
, Licinius, though
prominently displaying the images of Rome’s pagan pantheon on his own battle
line, forbade his troops from actively attacking the labarum, or even looking at
it directly.[16]

Constantine felt that both Licinius and
Arius
were agents of Satan, and associated them
with the serpent described in the
Book of Revelation
(12:9).
Constantine represented Licinius as a snake on his coins.

Eusebius stated that in addition to the singular labarum of Constantine,
other similar standards (labara) were issued to the Roman army. This is
confirmed by the two labara depicted being held by a soldier on a coin of
Vetranio
(illustrated) dating from 350.

Later usage


Modern ecclesiastical labara (Southern Germany).


The emperor
Constantine Monomachos
(centre
panel of a Byzantine enamelled crown) holding a miniature labarum

The Latin Empire or Latin Empire of Constantinople (original

Latin

name: Imperium Romaniae, “Empire of

Romania

“)

is the name given by historians to the

feudal

Crusader state

founded by the leaders of the

Fourth Crusade

on lands captured from the

Byzantine Empire
.

It was established after the capture of

Constantinople

in 1204 and lasted until 1261. The Latin Empire was intended

to supplant the Byzantine Empire as titular successor to the

Roman

Empire
in the east, with a Western

Catholic

emperor enthroned in place of the

Orthodox

Byzantine emperors

.

Baldwin IX

,

Count of

Flanders
, was crowned the first Latin emperor as Baldwin I on 16 May 1204.

The Latin Empire failed to attain political or economic dominance over the other

Latin powers that had been established in former Byzantine territories in the

wake of the Fourth Crusade, especially

Venice
, and

after a short initial period of military successes it went into a steady

decline. Weakened by constant warfare with the Bulgarians and the Greek

successor states, it eventually fell to the

Empire of Nicaea

under Emperor

Michael VIII Palaiologos

in 1261. The last Latin emperor,

Baldwin II

, went into exile, but the imperial title survived, with several

claimants to it, until the 14th century.

//

 History

 Creation

of the Latin Empire

By arrangement among the crusaders, Byzantine territory was divided: in the

Partitio terrarum imperii Romanie, signed on 1 October 1204, three

eighths – including Crete

and other islands – went to the

Republic of

Venice
. The Latin Empire claimed the remainder, and did exert control over

areas of Greece
,

divided into

vassal

fiefs
:

the

Kingdom of Thessalonica

, the

Principality of Achaea

, the

Duchy of Athens
,

the

Duchy of the Archipelago

and the short-lived

duchies of Nicaea

,

Philippopolis, and

Philadelphia
.

The

Doge of Venice

did not rank as a vassal to the Empire, but his position in control of 3/8 of

its territory and of parts of Constantinople itself, ensured Venice’s influence

in the Empire’s affairs. However, much of the former Byzantine territory

remained in the hands of rival

successor states

led by Byzantine Greek aristocrats, such as the

Despotate of

Epirus
, the

Empire of Nicaea
,

and the

Empire of

Trebizond
, which were bent on reconquest from the Latins.

The crowning of Baldwin and the creation of the Latin Empire had the curious

effect of creating three so-called Roman Empires in Europe at the same time, the

others being the

Holy Roman Empire

and the remnants of the

Byzantine Empire

(the direct successor of the ancient Roman Empire), none of which actually

controlled the city of

Rome
, which was under the

temporal authority

of the

Pope.

 The

Empire in Asia Minor

Capture of Constantinople during the

Fourth Crusade

in 1204.

The initial campaigns of the crusaders in Asia Minor resulted in the capture

of most of Bithynia

by 1205, with the defeat of the forces of

Theodore I Lascaris

at Poemanenum and Prusa. Latin successes continued, and

in 1207 a truce was signed with Theodore, newly proclaimed Emperor of Nicaea.

The Latins inflicted a further defeat on Nicaean forces at the Ryndakos river in

October 1211, and three years later the

Treaty of Nymphaeum (1214)

recognized their control of most of Bithynia and

Mysia
.

The peace was maintained until 1222, at which point the resurgent power of

Nicaea felt sufficiently strong enough to challenge the Latin Empire, by that

time weakened by constant warfare in its European provinces. At the

battle of Poemanenum

in 1224, the Latin army was defeated, and by the next

year Emperor

Robert of Courtenay

was forced to cede all his Asian possessions to Nicaea,

save Nicomedia

and the territories directly across Constantinople. Nicaea turned

also to the

Aegean, capturing the

islands awarded to the Empire. In 1235, finally, the last Latin possessions fell

to Nicaea.

 The

Empire in Europe

Unlike in Asia, where the Latin Empire faced only an initially weak Nicaea,

in Europe it was immediately confronted with a powerful enemy: the

Bulgarian

tsar

Kaloyan

. When Baldwin campaigned against the Byzantine lords of

Thrace
, they

called upon Kaloyan for help. At the

Battle of Adrianople

on 14 April 1205, the Latin heavy cavalry was lured

into an ambush by Kaloyan’s troops, and Emperor Baldwin was captured. He was

imprisoned in the Bulgarian capital

Tarnovo

until his death later in 1205. Luckily for the new Latin Emperor,

Henry of

Flanders
, Kaloyan was murdered a couple of years later (1207) during a siege

of

Thessalonica

, and the Bulgarian threat conclusively defeated with a victory

the following year, which allowed Henry to reclaim most of the lost territories

in Thrace until 1210, when peace was concluded with the marriage of Henry to

Maria of Bulgaria

, tsar

Kaloyan

‘s daughter.

At the same time, another Greek successor state, the

Despotate of

Epirus
, under

Michael I Komnenos Doukas

, posed a threat to the Empire’s vassals in

Thessalonica and Athens. Henry demanded his submission, which Michael provided,

giving off his daughter to Henry’s brother Eustace in the summer of 1209. This

alliance allowed Henry to launch a campaign in

Macedonia

, Thessaly

and

Central Greece

against the rebellious

Lombard

lords of Thessalonica. However, Michael’s attack on the Kingdom of Thessalonica

in 1210 forced him to return north to relieve the city and to force Michael back

into submission.

In 1214 however, Michael died, and was succeeded by

Theodore Komnenos Doukas

, who was determined to capture Thessalonica. On 11

June 1216, while supervising repairs to the walls of Thessalonica, Henry died,

and was succeeded by

Peter

of Courtenay
, who himself was captured and executed by Theodore the

following year. A regency was set up in Constantinople, headed by Peter’s widow,

Yolanda of

Flanders
until 1221, when her son

Robert of

Courtenay
was crowned Emperor. Distracted by the renewed war with Nicaea,

and waiting in vain for assistance from Pope

Honorius III

and the King of France

Philip II
,

the Latin Empire was unable to prevent the final fall of Thessalonica to Epirus

in 1224. Epirote armies then conquered Thrace in 1225-26, appearing before

Constantinople itself. The Latin Empire was saved for the time by the threat

posed to Theodore by the Bulgarian tsar

Ivan II Asen

, and a truce was concluded in 1228.

 Decline

and Fall

After Robert of Courtenay died in 1228, a new regency under

John of Brienne

was set up. After the disastrous Epirote defeat by the Bulgarians at the

Battle

of Klokotnitsa
, the Epirote threat to the Latin Empire was removed, only to

be replaced by Nicaea, which started acquiring territories in Greece. Emperor

John III Doukas Vatatzes

of Nicaea concluded an alliance with Bulgaria,

which in 1235 resulted in joint campaign against the Latin Empire, and an

unsuccessful

siege of Constantinople

the same year. In 1237,

Baldwin II

attained majority and took over the reins of a much-diminished

state. The Empire’s precarious situation forced him to travel often to Western

Europe seeking aid, but largely without success. In order to gain money, he was

forced to resort to desperate means, from removing the lead roofs of the

Great Palace

and selling them, to handing over his only son, Philip, to

Venetian merchants as a guarantee for a loan.

By 1247, the Nicaeans had effectively surrounded Constantinople, with only

the city’s strong

walls

holding them at bay, and the

Battle of

Pelagonia
in 1258 signaled the beginning of the end of Latin predominance in

Greece. Thus, on July 25, 1261, with most of the Latin troops away on campaign,

the Nicaean general

Alexios Strategopoulos

found an unguarded entrance to the city, and entered

it with his troops, restoring the Byzantine Empire for his master,

Michael VIII Palaiologos

.

 Titular

claimants

For about a century thereafter, the heirs of Baldwin II continued to use the

title of Emperor of Constantinople, and were seen as the overlords of the

various remaining Latin states in the

Aegean
.

They exercised effective authority in Greece only when actually ruling as

princes of Achaea

, as in 1333–1383. Although they are generally regarded as

titular emperors, the continued existence of Latin states in the Aegean that

recognized them as their suzerains makes the term a misnomer; a more accurate

description would be emperors-in-exile.

 Organization

and Society

 Administration

The empire was formed and administrated on Western European feudal

principles, incorporating some elements of the Byzantine bureaucracy. The

Emperor was assisted by a council, composed of the various barons, the Venetian

podestà
and

his six-member council. This council had a major voice in the governance of the

realm, especially in the periods of regency, where the Regent (moderator

imperii) was dependent on their consent to rule. The podesta, likewise, was

an extremely influential member, being practically independent of the Emperor.

He exercised authority over the Venetian quarters of Constantinople and

Pera
and the

Venetian dominions within the Empire, assisted by a separate set of officials.

His role was more that of an ambassador and

vicegerent

of Venice than a vassal to the Empire.

 Society

The elite of the empire were the Frankish and Venetian lords, headed by the

Emperor, the barons and the lower-ranking vassals and liege lords, including

many former Byzantine aristocrats. The bulk of the people were

Orthodox

Greeks

, still divided according to the Byzantine system in income classes

based on land ownership.

 Church

As with all Latin states, the Orthodox hierarchy was replaced by

Catholic

prelates

, but not suppressed. An expansive Catholic hierarchy was

established, under the dual supervision of the Latin

archbishop

of Constantinople and the

Papal

legate
, until the two offices were merged in 1231. Catholic monastic orders,

such as the

Cistercians

, the

Dominicans

and the

Franciscans

were established in the Empire. The Orthodox clergy retained its

rites and customs, including its right to marriage, but was demoted to a

subordinate position, subject to the local Latin bishops.

 


Frequently Asked Questions

How long until my order is shipped?::
Depending on the volume of sales, it may take up to 5 business days for

shipment of your order after the receipt of payment.

How will I know when the order was shipped?:
After your order has shipped, you will be left positive feedback, and that

date should be used as a basis of estimating an arrival date.

After you shipped the order, how long will the mail take?
USPS First Class mail takes about 3-5 business days to arrive in the U.S.,

international shipping times cannot be estimated as they vary from country

to country. I am not responsible for any USPS delivery delays, especially

for an international package.

What is a certificate of authenticity and what guarantees do you give

that the item is authentic?
Each of the items sold here, is provided with a Certificate of Authenticity,

and a Lifetime Guarantee of Authenticity, issued by a world-renowned numismatic

and antique expert that has identified over 10000 ancient coins and has provided them

with the same guarantee. You will be quite happy with what you get with the COA; a professional presentation of the coin, with all of the relevant

information and a picture of the coin you saw in the listing.

Compared to other certification companies, the certificate of

authenticity is a $25-50 value. So buy a coin today and own a piece

of history, guaranteed.

Is there a money back guarantee?

I offer a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee. I stand

behind my coins and would be willing to exchange your order for

either store credit towards other coins, or refund, minus shipping

expenses, within 30 days from the receipt of your order. My goal is

to have the returning customers for a lifetime, and I am so sure in

my coins, their authenticity, numismatic value and beauty, I can

offer such a guarantee.

Is there a number I can call you with questions about my

order?

You can contact me directly via ask seller a question and request my

telephone number, or go to my

About Me Page to get my contact information only in regards to

items purchased on eBay.

When should I leave feedback?
Once you receive your

order, please leave a positive. Please don’t leave any

negative feedbacks, as it happens many times that people rush to leave

feedback before letting sufficient time for the order to arrive. Also, if

you sent an email, make sure to check for my reply in your messages before

claiming that you didn’t receive a response. The matter of fact is that any

issues can be resolved, as reputation is most important to me. My goal is to

provide superior products and quality of service.

  • Selection Required: Select product options above before making new offer.
  • Offer Sent! Your offer has been received and will be processed as soon as possible.
  • Error: There was an error sending your offer, please try again. If this problem persists, please contact us.

Make Offer

To make an offer please complete the form below:
$
Please wait...
YEAR

Year_in_description

DENOMINATION

Denomination_in_description

Shopping Cart